Thursday, January 31, 2008

On the Nature of Man; Thomas Hobbes

From Leviathan

So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory.

The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation. The first use violence, to make themselves masters of other men's persons, wives, children, and cattle; the second, to defend them; the third, for trifles, as a word, a smile, a different opinion, and any other sign of undervalue, either direct in their persons or by reflection in their kindred, their friends, their nation, their profession, or their name.

Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man. For war consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting, but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known: and therefore the notion of time is to be considered in the nature of war, as it is in the nature of weather. For as the nature of foul weather lieth not in a shower or two of rain, but in an inclination thereto of many days together: so the nature of war consisteth not in actual fighting, but in the known disposition thereto during all the time there is no assurance to the contrary. All other time is peace.

Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

1 comment:

Thirteen said...

Leviathan explains exactly why consensus democracy doesn't work. Now don't get me wrong, in theory consensus government is a great idea. But we obviously live in a vary flawed world. For example, if these comments we make on this blog were our "discussion" to come a consensus about what we should do in the class, there would be too many drastically different opinions to satisfy everyone. Even in this small of a "community" by the time we had anything decided we would have wasted valuable time and energy. Consensus may work in an extremely small village or the like but it will never happen for America. That's not being pessimistic that's being a realistic optimist.
I've come to question if the people of the United States would truly prefer a delegate representative versus a trustee. Trustees give the American people someone to blame when decisions go amiss and blow up in our faces. Whereas if the representatives were doing the will of the people we'd be the only ones to blame for our actions and wouldn't be able to have the kind of "government doesn't effect me" attitude you see in quite a few people.